Board of Directors Fox Family Y, Lancaster, Ohio

You know virtually how individuals gain control of the power of the Land and and then abuse that power like sometime United states of america President George "Dubya" Bush?  "Dubya" started a war in Republic of iraq which was highly profitable for some US businesses.  He achieved this b y claiming Iraq had a nuclear weapons program which was a serious earth security threat when Iraq did not and when it had already been bombed into oblivion by the war his Dad George Bush Snr waged on Republic of iraq in 1992: Valerie Plame Wilson: the housewife CIA spy who was 'fair game' for Bush UK The Telegraph By Chrissy Iley fifteen Feb 2011.

Remember how Bush was supported past Uk Premier Tony Blair who helped by persuading the British Parliament to join the United states of america with faked "intelligence" of Iraq'due south weapons of mass destruction which did not exist but which Blair claimed could be deployed inside 40 minutes and posed a serious security threat?

If yous recall that then yous volition know how these kinds of people manipulate the media.  Detect how they persuade u.s. we are in imminent danger of some threat or other and that they tin can save us all if nosotros trust them?

This trickery is not new.  It had been used for well over a century with smallpox.  The myth continues to this day.

On CHS we wrote previously well-nigh how unscientific the claim is that smallpox was eradicated past vaccination when that frankly is nonsense scientifically.  The demise of the disease came about as a result of the interaction of 3 completely different factors: isolation, attenuation and improved living conditions, particularly diet and sanitation. The effect cannot be attributable to the smallpox vaccine – whatever vaccine which takes over 100 years to work ipso facto proves itself not to have:

Small Pox – Big Lie – Bioterrorism Implications of Flawed Theories of Eradication

There was a nasty affliction called smallpox and it did kill people long ago.

This was peculiarly the case when the poor moved to the cities during the industrial revolution looking for work and choked them in overcrowded unsanitary slums ripe for convenance and spreading disease: London'due south commencement park built after rich feared disease spread from slums United kingdom The Contained By Andy McSmith Fri 07 Nov 2008; Hygiene History in the Industrialized World.

The middle and upper classes needed to exist reassured the State would continue them condom from the threat of disease.  The bulk of the population of entire countries were persuaded their States could achieve this by ensuring the then truly "corking unwashed" masses would be vaccinated and the disease controlled.  The trouble was this was a myth but the people wanted to believe and were persuaded.

Smallpox vaccination did not work and sometimes killed as many or more than the affliction itself whilst many of the "vaccinated" yet contracted the disease: Smallpox Bloodshed, UK, USA, Sweden.

Now you can read a relatively curt but well-referenced history of the myth of vaccination and the myth of its function in the eradication of smallpox:

Online Version – Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries Doctor – August 27, 2013

SMALLPOX MORTALITY- UK, USA & SWEDEN

In the graphs beneath observe the big numbers of deaths caused by the smallpox vaccine itself.  Past 1901 in the UK, more people died from the smallpox vaccination than from smallpox itself.  The severity of the disease dimished with improved living standards and was not vanquished past vaccination, as the medical "consensus" view tells us. Whatever vaccine which takes 100 years to "piece of work" did not.  On any scientific analysis of the history and data, crediting smallpox vaccine for the decline in smallpox appears misplaced.

When during 1880-1908 the City of Leicester in England stopped vaccination compared to the rest of the Great britain and elsewhere, its survival rates soared and smallpox death rates plummeted [see table below].  Leicester's arroyo also cost far less.

[Click Graph to Overstate – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

Extracts from "LEICESTER: Sanitation versus Vaccination" By J.T. Biggs J.P.

[Download Entire Book every bit .pdf 43 Mb  – Or Read Online]

Tabular array 21

SMALLPOX FATALITY RATES, cases in vaccinated and re-vaccinated populations compared with "unprotected" Leicester – 1860 to 1908.

Proper name.	Period.	Small-scale-Pox.  Cases	Pocket-sized-Pox. Deaths.	Fatality-rate per cent. of Cases
Nihon	1886-1908	288,779	77,415	26.8
British Army (United Kingdom)	1860-1908	1,355	96	seven.i
British Army (Republic of india)	1860-1908	2,753	307	xi.1
British Army (Colonies)	1860-1908	934	82	8.8
Imperial Navy	1860-1908	2,909	234	eight.0
Thou Totals and case fatality rate per cent, over all		296,730	78,134	26.3
Leicester (since giving upwards vaccination)	1880-1908	ane,206	61	5.1

Biggs said "In this comparison, I have given the numbers of revaccinated cases, and deaths, and each fatality-rate separately and together, and so that they may be compared either fashion with Leicester. In pro-vaccinist language, may I ask, if the excessive small-pox fatality of Japan, of the British Army, and of the Royal Navy, are non due to vaccination and revaccination, to what are they due? It would afford an interesting psychical study were we able to know to what heights of eloquent glorification Sir George Buchanan would accept soared with a corresponding issue—but on the opposite side."

Table 29.

Small-Pox Epidemics, Cost, and Fatality Rates Compared

	Vaccinal Status	Pocket-size-Pox Cases	Small-Pox Deaths	Fatality-rate Per Cent	Cost of Epidemic
London 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	9,659	1,594	xvi.50	£492,000
Glasgow 1900-02	Well Vaccinated	3,417	377	11.03	£ 150,000
Sheffield 1887-88	Well Vaccinated	vii,066	688	9.73	£32,257
Leicester 1892-94	Practically Unvaccinated	393	21	5.34	£2,888
Leicester 1902-04	Practically Unvaccinated	731	xxx	4.ten	£1,602

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

[Click Graph to Enlarge – Opens In New Window]

__________________________________________

Vaccination: A Mythical History ~ by Roman Bystrianyk and Suzanne Humphries MD

– August 27, 2013

With the approaching flu season and the enthusiastic calls to utilise the flu vaccine, yous might exist wondering where the idea of vaccination got its start. Where did the thought of injecting whole or bits of microbes and other substances into people in an attempt to provide protection against contagious affliction brainstorm?

Many medical and history books present a simple tale of the origin of vaccination. Virtually present the same basic tale of the bright observation of a simple country doctor and his courage in attempting to thwart a mortiferous and frightening disease of that time – smallpox, or as it was oft called the speckled monster. In a contempo and popular book, The Panic Virus, the author reiterates this archetype tale.

In 1796, Jenner enlisted a milkmaid named Sarah Nelmes and an eight-twelvemonth old male child named James Phipps to test his theory. Jenner transferred pus from Nelmes'southward cowpox blisters onto incisions he'd made in Phipps'due south hands. The boy came downwardly with a slight fever, but naught more. Afterwards, Jenner gave Phipps a standard smallpox inoculation – which should have resulted in a total-blown, albeit balmy, case of the disease. Nil happened. Jenner tried inoculating Phipps with smallpox again; once more, nothing. [i]

Edward Jenner'south idea eventually became known as vaccination, which is derived from the Latin give-and-take for moo-cow – vacca. It was originally referred to as cowpoxing, but somewhen the term vaccination was adopted. As the story goes, with this invention in place, smallpox would exist tamed and the world would be freed from the terror of the disease.

Such is the stuff of legends. The story is not unlike the classic Greek legends of Theseus defeating the child-devouring Minotaur, or Perseus beheading the deadly snake-headed Medusa, or many other classic stories of the brave hero defeating a mortiferous enemy. The Jenner legend has been reduced to a simple and memorable story of a hero defeating the deadly enemy, smallpox. Authors claim that with vaccination in place, "billions of lives" have been saved.[2]

Simply legendary heroes, particularly those that are used to support a belief, attain an iconic status while whatsoever unsavory aspects well-nigh the hero and the story are ignored or forgotten. Mythical tales are designed to evoke a positive emotional response to influence societal thinking.

The tale of defeating smallpox begins well before the story of our hero. Information technology begins with the concept of using pocket-sized amounts of smallpox pus and scratching it into the arms of healthy people. This thought was introduced to the Western world past Lady Mary Wortley Montagu in 1717. She had returned from the Ottoman Empire with cognition of the do of inoculation against smallpox, known as variolation. This type of inoculation was simply a matter of infecting a person with smallpox at a time and in a setting of his choosing. The idea behind inoculation was that, in a controlled setting, people would do better confronting the disease than if they contracted it at some maybe less desirable time and place in the time to come.

The idea was embraced past the medical profession and enthusiastically practiced. But because of the complexity and danger involved, inoculation remained an operation that could only be afforded by the wealthy.[three] The process did often help protect the private that was inoculated, but there was still an estimated 2-5% that died as a result.[4,5] Still, this was an improvement compared to a 20-25% mortality rate in those that had naturally contracted smallpox during an epidemic.[6] Just, was the departure in bloodshed due to inoculation alone? Or could information technology take had something to do with the fact that the wealthy had better admission to more nutritious food and a cleaner environment than the majority of order?

There was one major and generally unacknowledged drawback to variolation – those inoculated could and did spread smallpox creating more than deaths than in that location would have been naturally. In a 1764 article the author recognized that smallpox was a contagious illness and that the practice of variolation would create new vectors to spread it. He compared the smallpox deaths in the 38 years before the introduction of variolation to the 38 years later, and found that smallpox deaths had increased⎯not decreased. He was forced to conclude that variolation on the whole, led to worse issues, because it caused more than deaths than lives saved.

It is incontestably similar the plague a contagious affliction, what tends to cease the progress of the infection tends to lessen the danger that attends it; what tends to spread the contamination, tends to increase that danger; the practice of Inoculation manifestly tends to spread the contagion, for a contagious illness is produced by Inoculation where information technology would not otherwise accept been produced; the place where it is thus produced becomes a center of contagion, whence it spreads not less fatally or widely than it would spread from a center where the illness should happen in a natural way; these centers of contagion are obviously multiplied very greatly past Inoculation . . .[seven]

Yet, while the popularity of variolation varied, the trouble of it spreading smallpox, was largely unrecognized. Considering variolation had go a very lucrative procedure it was enthusiastically connected past most of the medical profession through the 1700s and into the early 1800s. Smallpox connected to be spread by this medically-sanctioned procedure.

Now enters the hero of our legend. Information technology was rumored among milkmaids that infection with cowpox would protect one from smallpox. In 1796, believing these stories, Edward Jenner performed an experiment on an 8-twelvemonth-old boy named James Phipps. He took disease matter that he believed to be cowpox from lesions on a dairymaid, Sarah Nelmes, and vaccinated James Phipps with it. He later deliberately exposed the kid to smallpox equally a test to run into if he was protected past the cowpox inoculation. When the male child did not contract clinical smallpox, information technology was assumed that the technique of vaccination was successful.

In 1798 Jenner published his results claiming lifelong protection against smallpox using his discovery with only rumors to support his contention. While he promoted the use of his technique based on the tale that someone infected with cowpox would be immune to smallpox, there were doctors of the fourth dimension who challenged this myth, because they had seen smallpox follow cowpox. At a meeting of the Md-Convivial Club, Jenner was ridiculed over his practice.

But he [Jenner] no sooner mentioned information technology than they laughed at it. The cow doctors could take told him of hundreds of cases where small-pox had followed moo-cow-pox . . . [8]

From the beginning there were problems with Jenner's process. In 1799, Mr. Drake vaccinated a number of children with cowpox affair obtained from Edward Jenner. The children were then tested by being inoculated with smallpox to come across if the cowpox procedure had been effective. All of them developed smallpox, and vaccination failed to protect whatsoever of them. Jenner received the study just decided to ignore the results considering they were not in back up of his theory.[9]

Vaccination was rapidly embraced by many in the medical profession equally the respond to combating smallpox. Past 1801, an estimated 100,000 people had already been vaccinated in England with the belief that the process would produce lifelong protection. The medical customs continued to embrace Jenner'southward ideas amidst numerous accounts that refuted the theory of vaccination. Early reports indicated that at that place were cases of people who had cowpox, or were vaccinated, and were however dying of smallpox. Specific cases of cowpox and vaccine failure were reported in the 1809 Medical Observer.

A Child was vaccinated by Mr. Robinson, surgeon and apothecary, at Rotherham, towards the terminate of the year 1799. A calendar month later it was inoculated with modest-pox affair without effect, and a few months afterwards took confluent small-pox and died. 2. A adult female-servant to Mr. Run a risk, of Bungay, in Suffolk, had cow-pox in the casual way from milking. Seven years afterwards she became nurse to Yarmouth Hospital, where she caught small-pox, and died. 3 and iv. Elizabeth and John Nicholson, three years of age, were vaccinated at Battersea in the summer of 1804. Both contracted small-pox in May, 1805 and died . . . 13. The child of Mr. R died of pocket-size-pox in October 1805. The patient had been vaccinated, and the parents were bodacious of its security. The vaccinator's name was curtained. fourteen. The child of Mr. Hindsley at Mr. Adam's office . . . died of pocket-size-pox a year afterward vaccination.[10]

Reports through the early 1800s began to accumulate showing vaccination was not living up to its promise to protect from smallpox. A written report in 1810 from the Medical Observer noted 535 cases of small-pox after vaccination, 97 fatal cases, and 150 cases of vaccine injuries.[11] Notation that 97 deaths out of 535 cases is an xviii% fatality rate and is essentially the same fatality rate as smallpox before vaccination was introduced. This loftier fatality rate forth with 150 vaccine-related injuries was a direct challenge to this new and highly lauded medical procedure.

Some other article in 1817 reflected the reality of vaccination failure.

. . . the number of all ranks suffering under Small Pox, who have previously undergone Vaccination by the near skillful practitioners, is at present alarmingly great.[12]

In 1818 Thomas Dark-brown, a surgeon with xxx years of experience in Musselburgh, Scotland, published an article discussing his experience with vaccination. He stated that he was originally extremely positive in promoting vaccination and that no ane in the medical profession "could outstrip me in zeal for promoting vaccine practise." But after vaccinating 1,200 persons, he became disappointed in the promise of vaccination. His experience was that, after vaccination, people withal could contract and fifty-fifty die from smallpox, and that he could no longer support the practise.[thirteen]

Like today, surgeons and doctors of the time were handsomely compensated for performing vaccination and thus had a tendency to comprehend it every bit a new form of income. It is therefore quite significant for a doctor to have spoken out against it as Dr. Brown did.

Continued observations showed that smallpox could still infect those who previously had smallpox and that those who were vaccinated could also exist infected.

. . . during the years 1820, ane, and, 2 [1820-1822] there was a smashing hubbub about the pocket-sized-pox. It bankrupt out with the bang-up epidemic to the north . . . It pressed close to home to Dr. Jenner himself . . . It attacked many who had had small-scale-pox before, and often severely; almost to death; and of those who had been vaccinated, it left some alone, but fell upon smashing numbers.[xiv]

William Cobbett was a farmer, announcer, and English pamphleteer. In 1829 he wrote about the failure of vaccination to protect people from smallpox. Cobbett considered vaccination to be an unproven and fraudulent medical practice. He noted that:

. . . hundreds of instances, persons moo-cow-poxed by JENNER HIMSELF, have taken the real small-pox later on, and take either died from the disorder, or narrowly escaped with their lives![15]

During this time vaccine material was the "humanized" form, which meant that textile was taken from the arm of a previously vaccinated person to vaccinate the next person. Arm-to-arm vaccination continued for decades, simply equally failures increased at that place was a conventionalities that the vaccine had lost its original supposed authority, and there were calls to obtain fresh material directly from cows.[sixteen]

While the legend maintained that the vaccine textile came from cows, Jenner really believed the material originated from an infectious condition of horses called the "grease." From this and other beliefs, there were many attempts to recreate an original cow-based vaccine. All these attempts failed.[17] Some believed that cowpox was merely smallpox that was passed through cows and somehow made into a new affliction.[18] This faulty conventionalities would result in the cosmos of more smallpox epidemics.

In 1836 in Attenborough, Massachusetts, Dr. John C. Martin took fluid from the pock of a human who died from smallpox and inoculated it onto a cow'southward udder. He then took pus from that cow and used it to vaccinate people. A large smallpox epidemic ensued causing panic and sickness in many people over the subsequent months.[19] A later inquiry determined that this was goose egg more than the one-time practice of smallpox inoculation.[20]

Not only was vaccination failing and causing smallpox epidemics, but there were likewise reports of deaths from other causes shortly after vaccination. For example, a skin status called erysipelas was a especially prolonged and painful way to dice.

. . . a boy from Somers-town, aged five years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (9 days)." He had been vaccinated at the age of 4 months; one cicatrix . . . the wife of a labourer, from Lambeth, aged 22 years, "small-pox confluent, unmodified (8 days)." Vaccinated in infancy in Suffolk; 2 good cicatrices . . . the son of a mariner, anile x weeks, and the son of a sugar baker, aged 13 weeks, died of "general erysipelas later vaccination, effusion of the encephalon."[21]

Because arm-to-arm vaccination was being used, other diseases could be spread causing various epidemics. Infectious diseases attributed to vaccination included tuberculosis and syphilis. In 1863 Dr. Ricord spoke earlier the Academy at Paris.

First I rejected the thought that syphilis could be transplanted past vaccination. But facts accumulated more and more, and at present I must concede the possibility of the transfer of syphilis past means of the vaccine. I do this very reluctantly. At present I do not hesitate longer to acknowledge and proclaim the reality of the fact.[22]

As information technology became increasingly clear throughout the 1800s to more doctors and citizens that vaccination was not what it was promised to be, refusals increased. In order to deal with this, the judicial system intervened. In 1855, Massachusetts created a set of comprehensive laws providing for widespread vaccination.[23]

These laws and compulsory vaccination did nada to curb the problem of smallpox. Data from Boston that begins in 1811 shows that, starting effectually 1837, there were periodic smallpox epidemics that culminated in the neat 1872 epidemic. Later 1855, there were further smallpox epidemics in 1859-60, 1864-65, and 1867 and the infamous epidemic in 1872-73. This was the well-nigh severe smallpox epidemic since the introduction of vaccination.[24] These repeat smallpox epidemics showed that the strict vaccination laws instituted by Massachusetts in 1855 had no upshot at all (Graph ane). In fact, more people died in the twenty years later the strict Massachusetts vaccination compulsory laws than in the 20 years earlier.

Graph 1: Boston smallpox mortality rate from 1841 to 1880.

Past this point, the medical profession no longer claimed lifelong protection against smallpox from a single vaccination. Instead, claims were made that vaccination made smallpox less likely to kill or that smallpox would be milder. Calls were then made for revaccination. Claims were fabricated that revaccination had to be performed anywhere from yearly to every 10 years.[25]

While the majority of the medical profession supported vaccination, at that place were those that spoke out against the procedure. Dr. Longstaffe, a prominent doctor of Edinburgh England noted that huge profits were being fabricated by vaccinators. Immense financial gain combined with the force of law created the perfect environment that would impose vaccination upon the citizens of the Western world.

The public vaccinators have received immense sums from Parliament . . . In 1850 lone they amounted to £54,727, and in the nowadays year they will get nearly a quarter one thousand thousand. Other sums, also, which I cannot proper name, have been granted for the purpose of sustaining this monstrous fraud. Has ever a quack remedy produced so much proceeds?

[26]

In England, governmental control strengthened over the years, with progressively stricter laws designed to enforce vaccination. Laws previously passed in 1840 and 1853 were consolidated into oppressive compulsory laws in 1867 that included fines for parents who did non vaccinate their children. Nevertheless, through the 1800s, periodic smallpox epidemics continued to occur. A slap-up pandemic struck in 1872 and took the lives of thousands, even those who were vaccinated.

Every recruit that enters the French army is vaccinated. During the Franco-Prussian war there were twenty-3 thousand four hundred and sixty-nine cases of small-pox in that army. The London Lancet of July 15, 1871 said:

Of 9 thousand 3 hundred and ninety-two small-pox patients in London hospitals, six thousand eight hundred and fifty-four had been vaccinated. Seventeen and i-one-half per cent of those attacked died. In the whole state more than one hundred and twenty-two thousand vaccinated persons accept suffered from pocket-size-pox . . . Official returns from Germany show that between 1870 and 1885 one million vaccinated persons died from small-pox.[27]

Concerns over vaccine safety, effectiveness, and governmental infringement on personal liberty and freedom through compulsory vaccination stoked the fires of the anti-vaccine motility. People began to resist the government and chose to pay fines. Some even accepted imprisonment rather than allowing vaccination for themselves or their children. The public backlash culminated in the bully demonstration in Leicester England, in 1885. That same year Leicester'south government, which had pushed for vaccination through the use of fines and jail fourth dimension, was replaced with a new authorities that was opposed to compulsory vaccination. By 1887, the vaccination coverage rates had dropped to ten%.[28]

Instead of relying on vaccination, people began to rely on proper sanitation, quarantine of smallpox patients and thorough disinfection of their homes. They believed this technique was a inexpensive and constructive ways that eliminated the demand for vaccination. However, at that place were dire predictions from the majority of the medical customs that strongly endorsed vaccination and believed the low vaccination charge per unit would issue in a terrible "massacre," especially in the "unprotected" children.[29]

Despite such prophesies of doom from the medical profession, the majority of the boondocks's residents were steadfast in their belief that vaccination was non necessary to control smallpox. The prophecy that the Leicester residents would eventually be plagued with disaster never did come to pass. Low vaccination rates resulted in lower smallpox rates and deaths, than in well-vaccinated towns.[30] In fact, the lower vaccination rates correlated to an overall decrease in smallpox deaths (Graph 2). Leicester showed that by abandoning vaccination in favor of what became termed as the "Leicester Method," deaths from smallpox were far lower than when vaccination rates were high.

The experience of unvaccinated Leicester is an eye-opener to the people and an eye-sore to the pro-vaccinists the world over. Here is a peachy manufacturing town having a population of nearly a quarter of a 1000000, which has demonstrated by a crucial test of an experience extending over a catamenia of more than than a quarter of a century, that an unvaccinated population has been far less susceptible to small-pox and far less affected by that disease since it abandoned vaccination than it was at a time when ninety-five per cent of its births were vaccinated and its developed population well re-vaccinated.[31]

While vaccination was frequently promoted as a safety procedure, it frequently acquired sickness or even decease. From 1859 to 1922 official deaths related to vaccination were more one,600 in England (Graph iii). In fact, from 1906 to 1922 the number of deaths recorded from smallpox vaccination and smallpox were approximately the same (Graph iv).

Graph ii: Leicester England smallpox bloodshed charge per unit vs. vaccination coverage from 1838 to 1910.

Graph 3: England and Wales full deaths from cowpox and other effects of vaccination from 1859 to 1922.

Graph 4: England and Wales smallpox deaths vs. vaccination deaths from 1906 to 1922

At the finish of the 1800s, smallpox changed its grapheme. Later the summer of 1897, the astringent blazon of smallpox with its high death rate, with rare exception, had entirely disappeared from the United states. Smallpox turned from a disease that killed ane in 5 of its victims to one that merely killed anywhere from 1 in 50 and afterwards to equally low as 1 in 380. The disease could however kill, simply having go so much milder, it was frequently mistaken for various other pox infections or pare eruptions.

During 1896 a very mild type of smallpox began to prevail in the South and later gradually spread over the land. The mortality was very low and it [smallpox] was normally at kickoff mistaken for chicken pox. . .[32]

The author of a 1913 article in The Journal of Infectious Diseases presented a table showing that in 1895 and 1896 the smallpox decease rate was around xx%, as it had been historically. The table also showed that after 1896 the death rate fell off rapidly, starting with 6% in 1897 to as low as 0.26% past 1908. As the mild grade of smallpox replaced the classic type, smallpox could exist difficult to tell from chickenpox, which was, by this time, considered a mild disease of childhood.

. . . chickenpox, is a small-scale catching affliction of childhood, and is chiefly important because it frequently gives rise to difficulty in diagnosis in cases of mild smallpox. Smallpox and chickenpox are sometimes very difficult to differentiate clinically.[33]

By the 1920s information technology was recognized that the new grade of smallpox produced little in the way of symptoms, even though few had been vaccinated.

Individual cases, or even epidemics, occur in which, although in that location has been no protection by vaccination, the course of the illness is extremely mild. The lesions are few in number or entirely absent, and the ramble symptoms mild or insignificant.[34]

Despite this extremely depression vaccine coverage rate, in that location was never a resurgence of smallpox. Even though smallpox was non a major result, the practice of smallpox vaccination continued from the time of the last smallpox death in the The states in 1948 upwardly until 1963. This resulted in an estimated five,000 unnecessary vaccine-related hospitalizations from generalized rash, secondary infections, and encephalitis.

A 1958 written report detailed the cases of ix children in which ii died of a peel condition due to vaccination, at present existence termed eczema vaccinatum. The occurrence of this disease was estimated past the authors to exist betwixt i in 20,000 to 1 in 100,000 with a fatality rate of 4 to 40%.[35] Withal, they best-selling that almost cases were not reported and in that location was no authentic accounting on this outcome of vaccination. In that location were as well an estimated 200 to 300 deaths equally the event of smallpox vaccination, while during the aforementioned time at that place had just been i smallpox death in 1948.[36]

The last smallpox expiry in the United States following an importation occurred in 1948, but since that time in that location have been probably 200 to 300 deaths from smallpox vaccination.[37]

Eczema vaccinatum is still occurring today, as recently noted in the news. A toddler was infected by his war machine father after the father was vaccinated. After a prolonged admission, and a week of experimental treatments including immune globulin from donor blood and antiviral medication, the toddler recovered. The mother besides required treatment and virus was found all over the firm.[38]

Because of poor surveillance and vaccine reaction underreporting, the authors of a 1970 study idea that the number of smallpox vaccine-related deaths could actually take been even higher. This study just examined deaths from 1959 to 1968 in the Usa. If the deaths were this high in a country with a modern health-care organization, what was the total number of deaths from smallpox vaccination from 1800 to the present across the unabridged earth?

There were those in the medical customs who were relieved that the failure of compulsory vaccination never gained much public scrutiny. Instead, the focus was shifted to new types of vaccinations.

Compulsory vaccination which once had the suffrage of the nation has now hardly a serious supporter. Nosotros are ashamed to jettison the thought completely and perhaps afraid that if we did the accident of some future epidemic might put us in the wrong. We prefer to permit compulsory vaccination die a natural expiry and are relieved that the general public is not curious enough to need an inquest. In the meantime our attending is diverted to other and newer forms of immunisation.[39]

During this time with vaccination as near the only medically promoted way to deal with illness, at that place were doctors finding astonishing successes with smallpox using other methods. Vinegar is a mutual food product that is fabricated through fermentation of a multifariousness of sources. An 1877 article described the success that Dr. Roth had using vinegar for smallpox prophylaxis.

D. G. Oliphant, M.D., of Toronto, Canada, having read the article on the use of Acetic acrid in scarlet fever, writes of a "vinegar cure" as practical to minor pox. Dr. Roth kickoff claimed wonderful success in treatment regarding vinegar more reliable as a prophylactic in small-pox than Belladonna in red fever. Dr. Roth gave both to the sick and to the exposed two tabular array-spoonfuls of vinegar, afterwards breakfast and at evening, for 14 days. Few persons thus treated took the disease at all. None who adopted the rubber treatment died, while among those under ordinary treatment the bloodshed was equally usual.[40]

In 1899 Dr. Howe also demonstrated vinegar's ability to protect a person from acquiring smallpox. Those who used the vinegar protocol were able to take intendance of other people with smallpox without fright of contracting the disease. The author notes that despite several hundred exposures, vinegar was protective against smallpox and was considered an "established fact."[41]

Again, in 1901 professor MacLean promoted the idea of vinegar as a real preventative of smallpox. Dr. MacLean claimed that apple tree cider vinegar and no other type of vinegar should exist used 3 or four times a day to protect a person from contracting smallpox.

J.P. MacLean Ph. D., the renowned "anti" Secretary of the Western Reserve Historical Society, having readily overthrown the conclusions of all the great men who for a century past have been convinced of the efficacy of vaccination for the prevention of smallpox, now comes to the front in the newspapers with the real preventative. "Any person who has been exposed need have no fear of smallpox if he will take 2 or three tablespoonfuls of pure cider vinegar 3 or 4 times a day." The word may at present be regarded every bit airtight, and smallpox at terminal is conquered![42]

Apple cider vinegar might seem silly, only only because most people have been conditioned to have the age-old prophylaxis for smallpox: raw, illness-laden, contaminated pus scrapings from an infected animal'due south (usually a moo-cow) belly, diluted in glycerin, and scratched into the human arm with a metal prong until the arm was raw and bleeding. What seems sillier now?

Scurvy is a illness that results from a deficiency of vitamin C due to starvation or just an extremely poor or unbalanced diet. Vitamin C is essential for the formation of healthy collagen. Collagen is the protein that forms connective tissue in skin, bones, and blood vessels and likewise gives support to internal organs. In scurvy, the body is not able to generate adequate collagen or extracellular matrix proteins that serve as mortar holding cells together and, as a consequence, literally comes unglued and falls apart.

William A. Guy, dean of the Medical Department of King's College, described the poor diet of gilded miners in California in the 1850s. Thousands of miners subsisted on meat, fat, java, and alcohol while working long, difficult days under the unrelenting California sun. The vitamin C-deficient diet led many to develop scurvy.

Scurvy has been very prevalent among the gilded miners of California . . . the emigrants upon the overland journeys and at the mines, as living almost entirely upon fried bacon or fat pork and flour made into batter-cakes, and fried in the fatty, which completely saturates it. This is washed down with copious librations of strong coffee, and big quantities of brandy or whiskey are taken in the intervals of the meals . . . this has been the diet of thousands for months, under a scorching sunday, when the temperature was over a hundred in the shade, the men being at the same time subjected to the nigh intense labour.[43]

Although many died of cholera during the California Gold Rush of the mid-1800s, an estimated 10,000 men died from scurvy.

During the American Civil War twice every bit many died from nutritional deficiency related diseases as those killed in battle.[44] For case, the causes of expiry listed for Indiana soldiers buried at the National Cemetery in Andersonville, Georgia, shows that diarrhea and scurvy directly accounted for at least two-thirds.[45] Dysentery was the next mutual cause of death, with the infamous diseases such as smallpox, typhus, pneumonia, and gangrene responsible for simply a small fraction. Those who were killed in actual battle or who died every bit a effect of their wounds accounted but for i per centum of the total deaths.

Other big infectious killers such as scarlet fever, measles, diphtheria, and whooping cough (too known as pertussis) all greatly declined during this time to where they were either completely eliminated or considered mild childhood illnesses by the mid-1900s. This massive pass up of 99% of deaths in whooping cough and measles occurred before vaccines or antibiotics were available (Graph five & 6).

Graph v: England and Wales whooping cough mortality rate from 1838 to 1978.

Graph half-dozen: England and Wales measles bloodshed rate from 1838 to 1978.

The fairytale legend of a state md making a discovery that saved the world from the destruction of smallpox is a fundamental medical belief that continues to be echoed by indoctrinated and naïve doctors whenever vaccines are challenged. Smallpox vaccine, in the minds of medical professionals remains a colonnade of their vaccine faith. But the true history shows us a different reality.

The brand name of vaccination was indoctrinated into the world psyche as something to protect someone from an illness. This belief spawned off numerous other ideas using the aforementioned notion of injecting whole or parts of disease matter into living beings in attempts to protect them from a specific disease. The reality of vaccination is nothing shut to the myth.

Other extremely effective alternative methods of sanitation, nutrition, apple cider vinegar, and other solutions were ignored and have since vanished from societal collective memory. Instead nosotros were left with the mythical history of Jenner's nifty discovery and the continued onslaught of unsafe vaccines to newborn infants. Vaccines are at present a regular thing from cradle to grave, all in the name of supposedly healthier people. Now that the pall has been pulled back on the origins of vaccination, do more and more than vaccines seem like a good thought to you?

More information on the history of vaccination including polio, measles, whooping coughing, and lost remedies tin can be found in Dr Humphries' and Roman Bystrianyk'southward book "Dissolving Illusions" which can be constitute on amazon.com

Bibliography:
1.Seth Mnookin, The Panic Virus, Simon & Schuster, 2011, p. 31.
two.Science the Definitive Visual Guide, DK Publishing, 2009, p. 156.
three.Victor C. Vaughan, MD, Epidemiology and Public Health, St. Louis, C.5. Mosby Company, 1922, p. 189.
4.Frederick F. Cartwright, Illness and History, Rupert-Hart-Davis, London, 1972, p. 124.
v.William Douglass, MA, A Summary, Historical and Political, of the Offset Planting, Progressive Improvements and Present State of the British Settlements of Northward-America, London, 1760, p. 398.
half-dozen.Ann Jannetta, The Vaccinators: Smallpox Medical Cognition and the 'Opening' of Nippon, Stanford Academy Printing, 2007, p.179.
7."The Practice of Inoculation Truly Stated," The Gentleman's Mag and Historical Relate, vol. 34, 1764, p. 333.
eight.Dr. Walter Hadwen, The Case Against Vaccination, Goddard's Rooms, Gloucester, January 25, 1896, p. 12.
9.Charles Creighton, Jenner and Vaccination, 1889, pp. 95-96.
x.William Scott Tebb, MD, A Century of Vaccination and What it Teaches, Swan Sonnenschein & Co., London, 1898, p. 126.
11."Vaccination past Act of Parliament," Westminster Review, vol. 131, 1889, p. 101.
12."Observations on Prevailing Diseases," The London Medical Repository Monthly Journal and Review, vol. Viii, July-December, 1817, p. 95.
thirteen.Mr. Thomas Dark-brown, Surgeon Musselburgh, "On the Present State of Vaccination," The Edinburgh Medical and Surgical Periodical, Volume Fifteenth, 1819, p. 67.
xiv."Observations by Mr. Fosbroke," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 583.
fifteen.William Cobbett, Communication to Young Men and (Incidentally) to Young Women, 1829, London, pp. 224-225.
16.Dr. Delagrange of Paris, "On the Present State of Vaccination in France," The Lancet, vol. Ii, 1829, p. 582.
17."Cowpox Origin of," The Medico-chirurgical review and journal of practical medicine, vol. 20, 1834, p. 504.
18.Dr. Fiard, "Experiments upon the Advice and Origin of Vaccine Virus," London medical and surgical journal, vol. 4, 1834, p. 796.
19.Ephraim Cutter, MD, "Partial Report on the Production of Vaccine Virus in the United States," Transactions of the American Medical Association, vol. XXIII, 1872, p. 200.
twenty.Encyclopaedia Britannica, vol. 24, Philadelphia, 1890, p. 25.
21.The Morning Chronicle, Wednesday, April 12, 1854.
22."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
23.Susan Wade Peabody, "Historical Report of Legislation Regarding Public Health in the Land of New York and Massachusetts," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, Supplement no. iv, Feb 1909, p. 50-51.
24."Modest-pox and Revaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. CIV, no. vi, February 10, 1881, p. 137.
25.Dr. Olesen, "Vaccination in the Philippine Islands," Medical Sentinel, Apr 1911, vol. 19, no. four, p. 255.
26."Vaccination," New York Times, September 26, 1869.
27.M. West. Harman, MD, "A Md's Statement Against the Efficacy of Virus Inoculation," Medical Cursory: A Monthly Periodical of Scientific Medicine and Surgery: vol. 28, no. 1, 1900, p. 84.
28.The Parliamentary Debates, vol. CCCXXVI, June 1, 1888, p. 933.
29."A Sit-in Against Vaccination," Boston Medical and Surgical Journal, April 16, 1885, p. 380.
30.J. W. Hodge, Physician, "Prophylaxis to be Realized Through the Attainment of Health, Not by the Propagation of Disease," The St. Louis Medical and Surgical Journal, vol. LXXXIII, July 1902, p. xv.
31.J. Westward. Hodge, MD, "How Pocket-size-Pox was Banished from Leicester," Twentieth Century Magazine, vol. Three, no. 16, January, 1911, p. 342.
32.Charles 5. Chapin, "Variation in Type of Infectious Illness as Shown by the History of Smallpox in the United states of america," The Periodical of Infectious Diseases, vol. 13, no. 2, September 1913, p. 173.
33.John Gerald Fitzgerald, Peter Gillespie, Harry Mill Lancaster, An introduction to the practice of preventive medicine, C.V. Mosby Visitor, 1922, p. 197.
34.John Cost Crozer Griffith, The diseases of infants and children, Volume 1, W.B. Saunders Company, 1921, p. 370.
35.Audrey H. Reynolds MD and Howard A. Joos MD, Exczema Vaccinatum, Pediatrics, Baronial 1958, pp. 259-267
36.David Koplow, Smallpox: The Right to Eradicate a Global Scourge, 2004, Academy of California Printing, p.21.
37.The Yale periodical of biology and medicine, 1968, vol. 41, p. x.
38.Maggie Play tricks, 2007, Toddler Survives Smallpox Vaccine Reaction, Reuters.
39.Dr. Charles Cyril Okell, "From a bacteriological dorsum-number," Lancet, Jan 1, 1938, pp. 48-49.
40."Acerb Acrid in Carmine Fever," American homoeopathist—A Monthly Periodical of Medical Surgical and Sanitary Science, vol. 1, no. 1, July 1877, p. 73.
41."Vinegar to Prevent Smallpox," The Critique, January 15, 1899, p. 289.
42.Cleveland Periodical of Medicine, vol. VI, no. one, 1901, p. 58.
43.William A. Guy, "Lectures on Public Wellness. Addressed to the Students of the Theological Department of Rex's College," Medical Times, vol. 23, January 4 to June 28, 1851, p. 283.
44.Roy Porter, The Greatest Benefit to Flesh, Harper Collins, New York, 1997, p. 399.
45.Report of the Unveiling And Dedication of Indiana Monument at Andersonville, Georgia (National Cemetery), November 26 1908, pp. 73-102.

Filed under: ADHD, Aspergers, autism, Child Health Safety, MMR, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Impairment, Vaccines | Tagged: ADHD, Anti-vaccine Safety, Aspergers, autism, Cervarix, Gardasil, government, Health, HPV, HPV vaccine, medicine, mercury, MMR, politics, science, thimerosal, thiomersal, vaccination, vaccine, vaccine court, Vaccine Damage, Vaccines |

knighthagerre.blogspot.com

Source: https://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com/2013/12/23/smallpox-eradication-one-of-historys-biggest-lies-how-vaccination-did-not-eradicate-smallpox/

Share this post